Skip to main content

Judicial Survey Results

Resources for Judges

Successful partnerships with judges are crucial for our work.

This year, in partnership with Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, we are conducting a new study of judges’ perspectives and use of CASA/GAL volunteers. Stay tuned for the results!

Our last related study was in 2005, when we engaged Organizational Research Services to conduct a national survey of family court judges. Over 550 judges and commissioners from 49 states completed the survey. Ninety percent of respondents used CASA/GAL volunteers in their courts.

The objective of the survey was to evaluate:

  • the process used for assigning CASA/GAL volunteers to cases,
  • the role CASA/GAL volunteers play in supporting judicial decision-making and court processes, and
  • judicial satisfaction with local programs and volunteers.

Overall, judges agreed that the work of CASA/GAL volunteers is high-quality, beneficial to judicial decision-making and beneficial to the children and families served.

Learn about our model.

Among their findings were these:

  • Judges were most likely to assign CASA volunteers their most difficult and complex cases. When assigning a case to a volunteer, they particularly considered the instability of the child’s current placement, conflicting case information, concerns about implementation of services, and whether the case involves extreme neglect, physical abuse or sexual abuse.
  • Judges clearly valued input from CASA/GAL volunteers in their court decisions. Volunteer input was most highly valued for issues related to placement stability and the permanence and safety of the children while in placement.
  • Judges reported that CASA volunteers’ activities have been “very useful” in their decisions about case outcomes.
  • Judges found CASA volunteers to be very effective in a wide range of activities that support court processes. They found volunteers most effective in considering the best interests of the child and in monitoring the case.
  • Nearly half (48%) of responding judges’ dependency cases were assigned to a CASA/GAL volunteer.
  • There was general concern about the availability of CASA/GAL volunteers for court caseloads. Only 6% of judges “strongly agree[d]” that there were sufficient volunteers to meet the need.

Download the survey report or the executive summary

Read about our impact.